Skip to main content
· 2/27/2003

United States v. Clough

Citations

  • 246 F. Supp. 2d 84
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2766
  • 2003 WL 556258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding warrant failed to meet particularity requirement where it contained “no restrictions on the search, no references to statutes, and no references to crimes or illegality”
  • holding warrant failed to meet particularity requirement where it contained “no restrictions on the search, no references to statutes, and no references to crimes or illegality”
  • warrant that authorized seizure of any and all text messages and digital images on computer was “clearly excessive” and was not sufficiently particularized

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hornby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.