· 2/27/2003
United States v. Clough
Citations
- 246 F. Supp. 2d 84
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2766
- 2003 WL 556258
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding warrant failed to meet particularity requirement where it contained “no restrictions on the search, no references to statutes, and no references to crimes or illegality”
- holding warrant failed to meet particularity requirement where it contained “no restrictions on the search, no references to statutes, and no references to crimes or illegality”
- warrant that authorized seizure of any and all text messages and digital images on computer was “clearly excessive” and was not sufficiently particularized
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hornby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.