United States v. Clinton Earl John Ross, Ii, Also Known as Matthew James McCallister

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s “expressions of impatience did not amount to an unequivocal act or statement of withdrawal indicating an intent to revoke his consent”
• holding that statements of impatience did not amount to withdrawal of consent
• noting that the jury can rely on a “distinctive modus operandi” to connect a defendant to other crimes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).