Skip to main content
· 11/25/1981

United States v. Clifton Thibodeaux

Citations

  • 663 F.2d 520
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15704

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating the denial of a motion to amend a magistrate order where the district court erroneously applied a deferential appellate- review standard and remanding for the district court to apply a less deferential standard
  • vacating the denial of a motion to amend a magistrate order where the district court erroneously applied a deferential appellate review standard and remanding for the district court to apply a less deferential standard
  • “Because the district court was the court having original jurisdiction of the felonies charged, the district judge was not exercising an appellate jurisdiction”
  • Bail Reform Act of 1966 conferred “a responsibility on the district court to reconsider the conditions of release fixed by another judicial officer as unfettered as it would be if the district court were considering whether to amend its own action”
  • prior review statute conferred “a responsibility on the district court to reconsider the conditions of release fixed by another judicial officer * * * as unfettered as it would be if the district court were considering whether to amend its own action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Rubin, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.