· 3/26/1973
United States v. Clifton L. Person
Citations
- 478 F.2d 659
- 155 U.S. App. D.C. 455
- 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10914
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remark to witness after lineup that she had “done well” in picking defendant does not materially affect the certainty of the in-court identification
- statement by police officer to witness after lineup identification that she had “done well” did not taint in-court identification
- statement by police officer to witness after lineup identification that she had \done well\ did not taint in-court identification
- “[T]he mere fact that suspects are included within the line-up, and that witnesses know or assume this to be the case, is an inescapable aspect of line-up identification procedure.”
- “[T]he mere fact that suspects are included within the line-up, and that witnesses know or assume this to be the case, is an inescapable aspect of line-up identification procedure.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jame-Son, Leventhal, Per Curiam, Robb, William
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.