United States v. Clifford Theophilus Bogle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court’s refusal to exclude prior written statement of witness was “clearly harmless” where defense was able to impeach the witness about the statement on cross-examination
• defendant received Miranda warnings prior to questioning and court held that “express questioning constitutes interrogation only when it is reasonably likely to elicit an incrimination response”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).