United States v. Cliff Lande

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government established by a preponderance that drug was D-methamphetamine
• affirming D-methamphetamine determination based on affidavits of forensic chemists stating that they had never encountered clandestine lab producing L-methamphetamine (which has little stimulating effect
• reviewing finding on involvement of a specific isomer of methamphetamine for clear error
• noting evidence that l-methamphetamine has little if any stimulating properties compared to d-methamphetamine
• noting evidence that l-methamphetamine has little if any stimulating properties compared to d-methamphetamine
• relying on circumstantial evidence to uphold finding that drug involved was d-methamphetamine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).