United States v. Cleveland Tumblin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the prosecutor “exceeded a reasonable scope of questioning” when his inquiries began suggesting that the “defendant was a man who had spent most of his young life committing and serving time for crimes, rather than being gainfully employed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).