United States v. Claudia O'campo, United States v. Julian Redeondo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court is “under no obligation” to consider an argument that the movant did not raise
• “a new entrant cannot have his base offense level enhanced at sentencing for drug distributions made prior to his entrance merely because he knew they took place”
• “[A] new entrant cannot have his base offense level enhanced at sentencing for drug distributions made prior to his entrance merely because he knew they took place.”(emphasis added
• defendant’s criminal liability for aiding and abetting was affirmed because he “knowingly, willfully, and intentionally” assumed his role “to insure that the distributive transaction of cocaine for money was fully consummated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).