· 1/31/1983
United States v. Claret Echeverry
Citations
- 698 F.2d 375
- 12 Fed. R. Serv. 638
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30918
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- jury note indicating confusion and subsequent instructions that could have allowed for inconsistent factual determinations resulting in conviction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browning, Tuttle, Reinhardt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.