United States v. Clarence Samuel Robinson (84-5140), Charles T. Cornett (84-5141), James Harold Coldiron (84-5158)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In our view, the government’s motive is irrelevant to [the predisposition] issue . . . because even assuming that the government wanted to entrap [defendant], this motive would not affect [defendant’s] ‘readiness and willingness’ to commit the crime.” (citations omitted)
• “[T]he government’s motive is irrelevant to this issue [predisposition].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).