United States v. Clarence Rice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that jurors were properly instructed “that they needed to agree that one of the means had been used [to defraud victims], but that not all needed to agree on the same one”
• “In fraud cases jurors need not agree on ‘the precise manner in which the scheme violated the law,’ only the ‘general thrust’ of the scheme.”
• \Issues not raised in a party's opening brief are waived.\
• \Issues not raised in a party's opening brief are waived ....\
• \Issues not raised in a party's opening brief are waived.\
• “Issues not raised in a party’s opening brief are waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).