· 7/20/1984
United States v. Clarence Hayes
Citations
- 739 F.2d 236
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20301
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that it is not necessary to prove an accomplice to a Dyer Act violation knew of the stolen vehicle’s movement in interstate commerce
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Merritt, Martin, Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.