Skip to main content
· 7/20/1984

United States v. Clarence Hayes

Citations

  • 739 F.2d 236
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it is not necessary to prove an accomplice to a Dyer Act violation knew of the stolen vehicle’s movement in interstate commerce

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt, Martin, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.