United States v. Clarence Gene Leggett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• error not harmless because evidence at trial was in conflict and improperly admitted declarations corroborated one version of the evidence
• error not harmless because evidence at trial was in conflict and improperly admitted declarations corroborated one version of the evidence
• court finds ambiguity and inadequacy in instruction that informed jury it could consider evidence for purpose of corroboration, “if you find that it does corroborate” the declarant
• court finds ambiguity and inadequacy in instruction that informed jury it could consider evidence for purpose of corroboration, \if you find that it does corroborate\ the declarant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).