Skip to main content
· 6/10/1975

United States v. Clarence E. Masterson

Citations

  • 517 F.2d 8
  • 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14295

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying this rule in assessing the choice of law provision in a 10 professional boxing contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibson, Matthes, Heaney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.