United States v. Clarence E. Crowthers, and Nathaniel W. Pierce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We think defendants made a sufficient prima facie showing . . . and that the government, being in possession of the facts . . . , should have come forward with evidence . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).