United States v. Clarence D. Schreane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the second Barker factor favored “no one” when delay could be blamed on both parties
• holding that thirteen and one-half month delay attributable to government’s negligence was not presumptively prejudicial; and cases cited therein
• holding that a delay of four months and three weeks weighed against the defendant
• finding that a “verbal altercation” between the defendant and his nephew “qualifies as a startling event”
• finding that a \verbal altercation\ between the defendant and his nephew \qualifies as a startling event\
• finding that a “verbal altercation” between the defendant and his nephew “qualifies as a startling event”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).