Skip to main content
· 11/6/1952

United States v. Clare

Citations

  • 108 F. Supp. 307
  • 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2260

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a form substantially similar to Form H-9 that expressly stated that the new lender would retain a security interest for the existing credit transaction did not clearly and conspicuously disclose the plaintiff’s rescission rights
  • rejecting distinction between class action suit seeking rescission and one seeking declaration of right to rescind
  • “Without any rescission requests, nor subsequent denials by defendants, it is not at all clear that a justiciable controversy exists between the class and defendants.”
  • “With- out any rescission requests, nor subsequent denials by defendants, it is not at all clear that a justiciable contro- versy exists between the class and defendants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.