United States v. CITGO Petroleum Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing a circuit split, but agreeing with Newton Cty. Wildlife 14 Ass’n v. U.S. Forest Serv., 113 F.3d 110, 115 (8th Cir. 1997), and Seattle Audubon Soc’y v. Evans, 952 F.2d 297, 302-03 (9th Cir. 1991)
• “One does not reduce an animal to human control accidentally or by omission; he does so affirmatively.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).