United States v. Cinemark Usa, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accepting government’s representation that its Lara amicus brief represented the first widely published docu- ment expressly announcing that § 4.33.3 required comparable viewing angles
• “When an agency is interpreting its won regulations, even greater deference is due to the agency’s interpretation.”
• enumerating elements of issue preclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).