Skip to main content
· 8/4/2004

United States v. Christopher Wood

Citations

  • 378 F.3d 342
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 16021
  • 2004 WL 1737891

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the district court’s plea colloquy with a defendant is the proceeding that conclusively \establish[es] that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily enters his plea\
  • explaining that the plea colloquy is the avenue by which the court conclusively \establish[es] that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily enters his plea\
  • explaining that this Court “hold[s] the Government to a greater degree of responsibility than the defendant (or possibly than would be either of the parties to commercial contracts) for imprecisions or ambiguities in plea agreements.”
  • “Modification of the terms of a plea agreement is beyond the power of the district court.” (cleaned up)
  • “Modification of the terms of a plea agreement is beyond the power of the district court.” (cleaned up)
  • citing, in part, McGovern, 822 F.2d at 743

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, King, Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.