· 8/4/2004
United States v. Christopher Wood
Citations
- 378 F.3d 342
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 16021
- 2004 WL 1737891
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the district court’s plea colloquy with a defendant is the proceeding that conclusively \establish[es] that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily enters his plea\
- explaining that the plea colloquy is the avenue by which the court conclusively \establish[es] that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily enters his plea\
- explaining that this Court “hold[s] the Government to a greater degree of responsibility than the defendant (or possibly than would be either of the parties to commercial contracts) for imprecisions or ambiguities in plea agreements.”
- “Modification of the terms of a plea agreement is beyond the power of the district court.” (cleaned up)
- “Modification of the terms of a plea agreement is beyond the power of the district court.” (cleaned up)
- citing, in part, McGovern, 822 F.2d at 743
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilkinson, King, Duncan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.