United States v. Christopher Thomas Condon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a district court’s exercise of discretion under Rule 403 is afforded deference only where it “[does] not unfairly prevent a party from proving [his] case” (first alteration in original)
• affirming district court when it adequately considered and explained its concerns in excluding evidence under 403

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).