United States v. Christopher Lee Adjani Jana Reinhold

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of the suspect’s “extortion scheme . . . requiring the use of a computer” justified a search warrant for any computers found at the suspect’s home
• explaining that \[t]he government should not be required to trust the suspect's self-labeling\ because computer files are easy to disguise or rename
• finding permissible the removal for off-site search of a suspect’s computer along with the computer of a woman living with the suspect who was not identified in the warrant
• permitting search of all computers that suspect could access, even if not his
• “The Adjani warrant ‘deseribe[d] in great[ ] detail the items one commonly expects to find on premises used for the criminal activities in question _’ ” (alterations in original)
• “[W]e have never held that agents may establish probable cause to search only those items owned or possessed by the criminal suspect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).