Skip to main content
· 8/25/1989

United States v. Christopher James Mines

Citations

  • 883 F.2d 801
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12814
  • 1989 WL 97469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Defendant] might have withdrawn or limited his consent, even during the search. His failure to do so indicates he consented to the entire search and everything it revealed.”
  • “Mines might have withdrawn or limited his consent, even during the search. His failure to do so indi- cates he consented to the entire search and everything it revealed”
  • “Mines might have withdrawn or limited his consent, even during the search. His failure to do so indi- cates he consented to the entire search and everything it revealed”
  • “This court has held that the question of whether a search exceeds the scope of a suspect's consent is a factual one, to be determined on the basis of the totality of the circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Leavy, Strand

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.