United States v. Christopher Eric Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a court is not “required to accept as true 16 allegations that are merely conclusory, unwarranted deductions of fact, or unreasonable 17 inferences”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Paulette Hammick, A/K/A Rosslyn Forrester, A/K/A Carolyn A. James
  Seventh Circuit· 1994-09-22· cited 48×
• United States v. Charles Albert Stanfiel, III
  Tenth Circuit· 1998-12-21· cited 3×
• United States v. Caldwell
  Tenth Circuit· 2025-02-19· cited 3×
• United States v. Roberto Casals Difranchesco
  Tenth Circuit· 1995-06-15
• United States v. Leslie Nordine Monson
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-10-29

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Harry Jarmar Gordon
  Tenth Circuit· 1993-09-21· cited 258×
• United States v. Frierson, Jerome
  Third Circuit· 1991-10-01· cited 86×
• United States v. Larry Kinder, United States of America v. David Kinder
  Fifth Circuit· 1991-10-21· cited 75×
• Market/Media Research, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas
  Supreme Court· 1992-04-20· cited 51×
• United States v. Gordon Allen Maltais
  Tenth Circuit· 1992-04-15· cited 21×
• United States v. Traves v. Brownlee
  Tenth Circuit· 1992-07-27· cited 21×