United States v. Christopher Dascenzo A.K.A. Christopher Marcus Dascenzo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• against constitutional challenge, criminal arson statute, 18 U.S.C. § 844 (i), upheld using aggregation principle because the target property was used for commercial purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).