United States v. Christopher B. Matchopatow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well recognized that arguments not raised in the proceeding until the reply brief are waived.”
• “We hold that the government did not breach the terms of the plea agreement and that Matehopatow’s waiver of his right to appeal is therefore binding and valid.”
• arguments not raised until the reply brief are waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).