United States v. Christina Maria Mendoza-Paz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Apprendi does not render section 960 facially unconstitutional
• finding no error where district court determined drug quantity by preponderance of evidence and sentenced defendant below statutory maximum
• applying United States v. Buckland, 277 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir.2002) (en banc), 1 to hold that § 960 is constitutional
• reviewing admission of lay opinion testimony for abuse of discretion
• same, as to § 952

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).