United States v. Christie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a claim of outrageous misconduct where the Government allegedly violated guidelines that “do not themselves create rights for criminal defendants”
• affirming ninety-year sentence for fifty year old defendant who helped run a network that allowed for the 7 trading of hundreds of thousands of images of child pornography
• citing, inter alia, U.S. v. Perrine, 518 F.3d 1196, 1204 (10th Cir. 2008)
• reviewing trial testimony to which counsel failed to object for plain error
• “Federal courts have uniformly held that ‘subscriber information provided to an internet provider is not protected by the Fourth Amendment’s privacy expectation’ because it is voluntarily conveyed to third parties.”
• “Federal courts have uniformly held that ‘subscriber information provided to an internet provider is not protected by the Fourth Amendment’s privacy expectation’ because it is voluntarily conveyed to third parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).