United States v. Chingman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to apply equitable tolling on the basis of plaintiffs “vague and conclusional allegations”
• “Although [the plaintiff] presented a number of ‘additional facts that were found in discovery,’ she failed to explain how any of them would have changed the outcome or to show that they could not have been discovered through proper diligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).