Skip to main content
· 3/5/2021

United States v. Chimanga Smith

Citations

  • 990 F.3d 607

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming JCC’s analysis that relevant inquiry when assessing costs was whether information was relevant to any issue, not whether it was originally obtained in connection with different proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.