United States v. Children's Advocacy Center of Delaware

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding exception does not \cover a circumstance . . . where the land occupier fails to warn of a hazardous condition that the independent contractor is not there to repair\
• stating an order is \not preserve[d] . . . for review\ when it is \not identif[ied] . . . in [the] notice of appeal\
• stating appellant did not preserve an issue for review because it did not identify the order in its notice of appeal
• \we have imposed sidewalk liability on not just commercial owners but also their tenants\
• “We distinguished Abraham v. Gupta . . . , which held that no duty could be imposed on an owner of vacant property for the condition of abutting sidewalks, because in Gray the building had the potential to generate income.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).