United States v. Chet Searing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because the defendant had objected to specific facts in the PSR, the district court erred by ordering restitution without first requiring supporting evidence
• noting that \victims are entitled to recover for their losses regardless of their insurance coverage\ and third parties \are entitled to recover for the amounts paid on claims\ (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).