United States v. Cheryl C. Godbout-Bandal Bruce A. Rasmussen Wayne Field Richard D. Donohoo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the [Meyer] court found the language of the relevant statutes to be unambiguous, it rejected any resort to statutory construction to aid in interpretation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).