Skip to main content

United States v. Cherry

Citations

  • 31 M.J. 1
  • 1990 CMA LEXIS 1023
  • 1990 WL 122130

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The primary thrust of ... [Ohrt and Horner ] is that ... [RCM 1001(b) (5) ] does not permit a commander to give an opinion on a servicemember’s ‘potential for rehabilitation’ if his opinion is based solely on his view of the severity of the offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Everett, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.