Tenth Circuit· 7/13/2009
United States v. Cherry
Citations
- 572 F.3d 829
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15391
- 2009 WL 2005235
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \We review de novo whether the facts found by the court support the application of the guideline it selected.\
- \We review de novo whether the facts found by the court support the application of the guideline it selected.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Briscoe, Hartz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court· 2001-08-27· cited 490×
- United States v. NicholsTenth Circuit· 1999-02-26· cited 233×
- United States v. FortierTenth Circuit· 1999-06-30· cited 106×
- United States v. WolfeTenth Circuit· 2006-01-31· cited 91×
- People v. KempCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1957-05-02· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. GaynorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-09-29· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.