United States v. Chemco Photoproducts, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a jail sentence as a condition of probation was a sen- tence of imprisonment and, therefore, the trial court was not required to impose a $2,000 fine
• explaining that, under ORS 137.540(2)(a), the court had the authority to order as a special condition of probation that the defendant “be confined to the county jail” for up to one year or one-half the maximum period of confinement that could be imposed for DUII, whichever was less
• explaining that, under ORS 137.540(2)(a
• “Two statutes controlled the court’s decision about the amount of that fine. * * * [T]he court had discretion to order defendant to pay a fine * * * under ORS 161.635(1)(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).