United States v. Checo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• challenging racial bias in traffic stop which led directly to criminal charges
• challenging racial bias in traffic stop which led directly to criminal charges
• “Cano–Diaz’s Fourth Amendment claim is premature to the extent that [the criminal case] is still pending in state proceedings;” “[t]herefore, it is due to be dismissed without prejudice on this jurisdictional ground.”
• “[I]f Cano–Diaz proved that the City of Leeds officer who pulled her over did so for purely discriminatory motives based on her race or ethnicity, such proof of the illegality of the stop would invalidate any convictions resulting therefrom.”
• “[I]f Cano–Diaz proved that the City of Leeds officer who pulled her over did so for purely discriminatory motives based on her race or ethnicity, such proof of the illegality of the stop would invalidate any convictions resulting therefrom.”
• “[I]f [Plaintiff] proved that the City of Leeds officer who pulled her over did so for purely discriminatory motives based on her race or ethnicity, such proof of the illegality of the stop would invalidate any convictions resulting therefrom.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).