United States v. Chauncey Gilbert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing abrogation of United States v. Millan, 912 F.2d 1014 (8th Cir. 1990), on ground that no bright-line rule exists for determining Fourth Amendment seizure
• rejecting “bright-line” rule that seizure occurs when officer identifies himself as narcotics agent and shows badge
• rejecting “bright-line” rule that seizure occurs when officer identifies himself as narcotics agent and shows badge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).