United States v. Charles Yi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no clear error where the district court “both considered and permissibly gave little or no weight to the defense expert’s opinion” regarding the potential harm of asbestos exposure
• “An instruction is appropriate if it is ‘supported by law and has foundation in the 28 USA V. GALECKI evidence.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).