Skip to main content
· 10/22/2004

United States v. Charles William McHan

Citations

  • 386 F.3d 620
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 22052
  • 2004 WL 2366169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing “we are, of course, entitled to affirm on any ground appearing in the 11 record, including theories not relied upon or rejected by the district court” (alterations and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Widener, Niemeyer, Luttig

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.