United States v. Charles Thomas Walraven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reasonable suspicion existed for investigatory stop in part because vehicle failed to stop promptly in response to police lights
• pre- Hodari D. case holding that reasonable suspicion existed for investigatory stop in part because vehicle failed to stop promptly in response to police lights
• suspicious actions, nervousness, and failure to promptly yield to flashing police lights
• “In determining the reasonableness of an investigative detention, ‘common sense and ordinary human experience must govern over rigid criteria.’” (emphasis added) (quoting United States v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675, 685 (1985))
• “Because they are in plain view, no privacy interest exists in license plates.”
• “[B]ecause they are in plain view, no privacy interest exists in license plates.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).