United States v. Charles T. Walsh and Bowe, Walsh & Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]here Congress has made sufficiently clear its intention to impose multiple punishments for the same act, imposition of such punishment is constitutional.”
• forfeiture reaches all assets of the tainted enterprise except as limited by the 8th Amendment
• “[T]he statute of limitations is an affirmative defense, not cognizable on appeal unless properly raised below.”
• mayor of city in New Jersey agreed in New Jersey to accept bribe and traveled to New York to collect it
• forfeiture of a defendant's stock ownership in a corporate enterprise under Sec. 1963(a)(2) applies to the defendant's entire ownership interest even when only part of the company's business was shown to be illegitimate
• limitations defense not properly raised below is not reviewable on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).