United States v. Charles Stewart Scardino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming that Leary is not retroactive, nevertheless held that Leary applied to Scardino since his sentence had not been finally ordered
• assuming that Leary is not retroactive, nevertheless held that Leary applied to Scardino since his sentence had not been finally ordered
• assuming that Leary is not retroactive, nevertheless it was held that Leary applied to Scardino since his conviction was not final
• assuming that Leary is not retroactive, nevertheless it was held that Leary applied to Scardino since his conviction was not final

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).