Skip to main content
· 6/30/1995

United States v. Charles Shark

Citations

  • 51 F.3d 1072
  • 311 U.S. App. D.C. 182
  • 1995 WL 224845

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • con-cluding that withdrawal of the objection in exchange for having Shark’s name deleted from the transcript and a favorable jury instruction was a tactical choice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Silberman, Buckley, Ginsburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.