United States v. Charles S. Hammett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that marijuana plants viewed through crack in wall are in “plain view”
• finding marijuana plants were in plain view when observed by police officers circling home to locate occupants
• Ninth Circuit upholding the propriety of the officers “circling [the defendant’s] house” in an attempt to find another door
• “[A police] officer may, in good faith, move away from the front door when seeking to contact the occupants of a residence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).