· 9/14/1999
United States v. Charles Rudolph
Citations
- 190 F.3d 720
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 22046
- 1999 WL 710287
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- post-sentence rehabilitation relevant “only after an appeal where there is a remand for re-sentencing, a defendant successfully prosecutes a collateral attack, or in infrequent occurrences such as the passage of a pertinent and retroactive amendment to the sentencing guidelines”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keith, Boggs, Clay
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.