Skip to main content
· 9/14/1999

United States v. Charles Rudolph

Citations

  • 190 F.3d 720
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 22046
  • 1999 WL 710287

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • post-sentence rehabilitation relevant “only after an appeal where there is a remand for re-sentencing, a defendant successfully prosecutes a collateral attack, or in infrequent occurrences such as the passage of a pertinent and retroactive amendment to the sentencing guidelines”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith, Boggs, Clay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.