Skip to main content
· 6/2/1989

United States v. Charles Richard Tedford

Citations

  • 875 F.2d 446
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 7870
  • 1989 WL 56819

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that doctrine applies only when actual constitutional violation occurs, and not violation of prophylactic rule
  • “A trial court’s finding of consent will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous.”
  • objective reasonable reliance on search warrant is a question of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aldisert, Reavley, Higginbotham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.