Skip to main content
· 1/5/1990

United States v. Charles R. Muehlbauer

Citations

  • 892 F.2d 664
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 214
  • 1990 WL 839

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • absent indication of what putative witness's testimony might have been, court attributes counsel's failure to call witness to routine trial tactics
  • defendant failed to demonstrate what evidence was available, what testimony witnesses might have offered
  • defendant must identify specific acts or omissions that gave rise to prejudice
  • evidence sufficient where defendant was present at key conversations and when drugs removed from car trunk, monitored police transmissions and stood lookout during the transaction, and attempted to hide loaded weapon at the time of the arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Grant, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.