United States v. Charles Michael Kissick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a guideline amendment was substantive because “our Circuit had reached a conclusion contrary to the Sentencing Commission’s interpretation”
• noting that a criminal defendant must 14 demonstrate that counsel's performance rendered the proceeding \fundamentally unfair or unreliable\ to show prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).