United States v. Charles McCullough

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no confrontation right violation where the district court limited cross-examination to “basic information about [the witness’s] convictions” and prohibited, inter alia, descriptions of the witness’s conduct during the incidents leading to his convictions (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).